🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an cute small “playful character”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a sizeable but very loyal friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canadian amusement park have become pawns in a struggle between a shuttered park, local and national governments and advocacy groups.

But those working directly with the whales say the impassioned controversy over their future often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the people who work with them regularly.

After the national authorities prevented the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held threatened to end their lives unless the government covers the upkeep of their survival. Canada’s fisheries minister has denied that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious circumstance.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Researchers say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, problem solving and group interactions suggest they are deeply intelligent creatures – something one caretaker discovered directly.

She spent three years as a beluga trainer, a position that involved gaining confidence of the marine predators.

“Building up those relationships over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so wonderful and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless astounded by the details and unique traits in their dispositions. She formed a deep bond for a pair of whales with opposing natures.

“One whale chose me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Both changed the way I view bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Her connection with the whales evolved against a backdrop of rising activist criticism to their enclosure.

During her three years at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have died at the park since 2019, a number which the park attributes to expected lifespan, but which advocates say reflects the inadequate care in which they were maintained.

The park did not operate to the visitors over the recent season, but Burgess says she observed directly consequences of the cessation. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the tanks because they’re in disrepair and not being maintained. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and move about with pieces in their mouth. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not comment to a inquiry, but previously asserted: “The whales … obtain far superior veterinary services and constant care than any individual in the United Kingdom, or other places.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was fired from the park in early March following the death of a beluga, an unwell beluga the caretakers had to euthanize. She said the park suspected particulars of the death were shared to the news outlets and she was released shortly thereafter.

The uncertainty over the whales’ outcome has left her and other caretakers in anguish. She says the park’s ultimatum to end the lives of its whales is a leverage tool and is a “practically unfeasible” undertaking, adding any efforts to put down even a one beluga would require “considerable personnel”, equipment and heavy equipment.

“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess advocates for calls for the whales to be taken right away from the park, with its failing enclosures and reduced personnel.

In recent months, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a request to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the proposal would have meant a ongoing existence in captivity and a return to performance for audiences,” the official wrote. “As the public, we know that marine mammals are meant for the wild, not in pools for our entertainment. I could not in ethical standing permit an relocation that would continue the situation these belugas have experienced.”

But Burgess said the minister’s remarks indicate a wider lack of awareness of the circumstances of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The public needs to realize these are whales that have lived entirely in captivity and they will need ongoing assistance for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As authorities struggle to find a resolution, proposals have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. One proposal called for the belugas to be released into the open waters of northern regions – where whales are a important part of nourishment for local populations.

A suggested protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which now received government approval, has proven highly debated. The prospective site, which includes extensive space of protected cove, is not yet built. Advocates remain optimistic that it could ultimately represent a long term answer for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among staff she’s consulted, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Different voices say the idea of a sanctuary indicates a worldwide trend away from animal displays and could represent a feasible solution in the short term.

Charles Vinick, head of the initiative, said the facility will simulate the mental engagement and nutrition the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the well-being of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|